Our address:

Ed Newbold
#1 Economy Arcade, 93 Pike Street, Seattle, Washington 98101

Pike Place Market Website:

Pike Place Market

Call the store:

(206) 652 5215

Let Economics help fight climate change
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-8741,single-format-standard,theme-bridge,bridge-core-3.1.9,woocommerce-no-js,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_updown_fade,page_not_loaded,boxed,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,overlapping_content,columns-4,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-30.6.1,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.7.2,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-12768

Let Economics help fight climate change

Let Economics help fight climate change

Posted Sept. 21, 2015 from Seattle,WA; updated Oct 5, 2015

I ran an ad in the A-section of the Seattle Times on Tuesday Sept. 22, 2015, that presents my belief that the green position on the upcoming Seattle Transportation Levy is No.  I’m running it again on Oct 6, 2015.

 seattle times ad trans levy for September blog 2015

It’s an age-old practice in the US to fund the roadway—often all county roads and sometimes portions of state roads—with revenue from the property tax. However, it is a bad practice because it undermines the ability of the market to efficiently equilibrate the supply of roads with the demand for roads.

In other words, because the driver is not paying for the cost of the roadway– (they may pay property tax for the road but not in their capacity as a road user and not proportional to the intensity of their use of the roadway) — they experience the road’s cost as being lower than it really is. Thus they will use more of it, and be less inclined to seek alternatives to using it.

While climate-altering pollution is the concern I expressed in the ad, it should be noted that two other major problems—congestion and public health—are also adversely affected when government subsidizes driving, so a person can be a climate-change denier and still agree with me.


The ad falls into the broad two-part strategy that I and many others advocate in dealing with climate-change.

  1. Remove all government subsidies for fossil fuels (or simply all government subsidies for energy of any kind.)

  2. Put a price on Carbon.

To put a price on Carbon, the best way in WA state is I-732 by Carbon Washington.   This is thrilling as Washington could become the first state to institute a Carbon Tax.  732 would put a price on every ton of Carbon that increased at the same time the State Sales tax and the B & O tax would be decreased by an equivalent amount. Sign it soon, if you can, collect signatures if you can.

 I-732 for website

In an email to supporters Carbon Washington leader Yorum Bauman recently posted a link to a Wall Street Journal article by Richard Revesz that advocated the approach of zeroing out subsidies and putting a price on Carbon.  Revesz points out that we subsidize fossil fuels to the tune of 4.7 billion a year with favorable treatment of asset-depreciation accounting.   Here’s the URL:           http://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2015/09/15/lets-cut-all-energy-subsidies-and-start-taxing-pollution/

Other subsidies

Here is an oil train car in Aberdeen, WA taken last Sunday Sept 20, 2015. Governments pay to develop disaster-response plans for oil trains and the public assumes most of the risk. This is a subsidy.

Here is an oil train car in Aberdeen, WA taken last Sunday Sept 20, 2015. Governments pay to develop disaster-response plans for oil trains and the public assumes most of the risk. This is a subsidy.



There are many other forms of subsidy for fossil fuels in addition to favorable tax treatment.  Eminent Domain for pipelines is a government subsidy not available to other industries, and it is not only a subsidy but a violation of the US Constitution which restricts Eminent Domain to only uses involving a “public good.”   There are many, many more also, some hidden.   A huge one is the below-market royalties and fees charged the fossil fuel industry for drilling and mining on public lands.  A more abstract subsidy is that the owners of the roadway infrastructure, the citizen, never earns a profit from her/his ownership, as any private owner would in a free market.   Throughout Europe the citizen does turn a profit from their ownership of the roadway and it helps pay the cost of government. (I’m not suggesting growing government, as with I-732, there are plenty of regressive taxes that can be lowered to make any change revenue-neutral).

News-media ‘blackout’

Notice that news media in Washington state and news media nationally, such as NPR & the Seattle Times, almost seem to be intentionally ignoring I 732 as they have long-ignored British Colombia’s revenue-neutral Carbon tax.  The lack of reporting about the successful BC approach in particular is rather stunning given the fact that BC’s Carbon tax is working in every respect: It is reducing Carbon use, but not growing Government and not hurting the economy.

I’m not positive but my website whiz Chris Cart of g-blu design may have fixed my spam problem and made commenting possible.  I hope so.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.